Visa litigation raises a question of the effectiveness of rights when their recognition comes at the end of lengthy proceedings. The annulment of an unlawful decision is a legal victory. It is not always enough to preserve the family life or the professional project that the appeal was meant to protect.
In our practice, we witness silent suffering: parents separated from their children, women facing difficult pregnancies far from their husbands, employees whose recruitment cannot wait for the outcome of the trial. Behind the briefs and judgments, people live with the immediate consequences of a wait whose length and outcome they do not control.
Procedural delays incompatible with the French labour market
When an employer recruits abroad, it is meeting a present need. The candidate organises his or her professional future around a concrete job. A visa refusal forces both to wait, without knowing whether their timetables will still meet.
A fast-food employee: twenty months before the court
A Tunisian national was to take up a permanent job in fast food. The work authorisation was granted in April 2023, for a start on 1 May. After the refusal of September 2023, we referred the matter to the court in March 2024. The judgment was delivered on 3 December 2025: twenty months and fourteen days of proceedings before the court. The refusal was annulled with an injunction to issue the visa within three months (TA Nantes, 3 December 2025, no. 2404305).
An electromechanical technician: thirty-two months after the refusal
A Senegalese electromechanical technician was recruited on a permanent contract after a documented training and career path. The refusal dates from 18 January 2024; our application was registered on 27 July 2024. The court ruled on 28 September 2026, after twenty-six months and one day, annulling the refusal and ordering the visa to be issued within three months. Thirty-two months had passed since the consular refusal (TA Nantes, 28 September 2026, no. 2411641).
In our practice, in the vast majority of cases, by the time the judgment is delivered the employer has moved on, and so has the employee. Specific procedures for examining work visa applications should be put in place to strengthen France’s competitiveness and attractiveness.
She wins her case, but the internship is over
A Senegalese doctor was to complete a practical internship from 15 to 30 April 2024 to validate a university training course. Her visa was refused on 13 March. The administrative appeal failed; we went to court on 29 October 2024. The judgment came on 26 June 2026, more than a year and a half later. The court found that the documents justified the professional purpose of the trip and that the guarantees of return were sufficient, and rejected the new ground put forward by the Ministry. The refusal was annulled.
Yet the judge did not order the visa to be issued: the internship dates had passed (TA Nantes, 26 June 2026, no. 2416917). The limit of reparation by annulment appears in the operative part of the judgment itself.
High-risk pregnancies lived far from the husband
In two family reunification cases, the result sought urgently was only obtained at the second urgent application.
In the first, a Senegalese father was prevented from joining his wife in France after a refusal of 2 April 2026. Our application described a pathological pregnancy, the need for daily assistance and a hospitalisation in September, while the wife also had a young child to care for. The urgent application registered on 16 September led on 1 October to the suspension of the refusal and a re-examination within one month. The judge expressly found that the refusal prolonged the family separation and recognised urgency as well as serious doubt as to the assessment of civil status, respect for family life and the interest of the child (TA Nantes, interim order, 1 October 2026, no. 2619304). Fifteen days separated the application from the order, but this period does not reflect the earlier steps nor the months of pregnancy already lived apart.
In the second, a Guinean national living in Senegal was to join her husband in France. Family reunification had been authorised in June 2025; the visa was refused in March 2026. A first urgent application was rejected in June, as no particular complications had yet been shown. Her health deteriorated, we went back to the judge in September, and the court then recognised urgency in view of the separation, the pregnancy and her state of health, and suspended the refusal.
Winning late does not give back lost time
These cases are only a glimpse of the realities we encounter. They invite us to measure favourable decisions against what they can still preserve: being proved right late does not give back the time of separation, nor the opportunities lost.
This reflection calls for faster procedures, a more individualised consular examination and greater use of urgent remedies when a life project is at stake.
Read also: Visa refusals in France: grounds, appeals and solutions.
Need help with your case?
FATOU BABOU AVOCAT assists individuals, families and companies with visas, family reunification, residence permits and appeals against refusals, before consulates, prefectures and courts.
- Bordeaux office: 11 rue Galin, 33100 Bordeaux, France – +33 9 85 40 18 64 – contact@legalfb-avocat.fr
- Dakar office: 14 rue Woro Fila, Fann Hock, Dakar, Senegal – +221 77 173 69 05 / +221 33 844 29 16 – contact@fbavocat-sn.com
- Book an appointment online
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Rules, amounts and deadlines change regularly: always have your own situation checked by a lawyer.